Efficient Online Marking
Automate scoring processes and track progress across large-scale assessments with intelligent workflows that reduce administrative overhead whilst maintaining marking quality and consistency.
16+ Question Types
Score multiple choice, mathematical expressions, programming assignments, interactive items and more automatically upon submission without manual intervention.
Automatic Workflow Setup
Configure online marking workflows during assessment creation with automatic detection of question types and appropriate scoring methods based on content requirements.
Smart Auto-scoring
Account for work-through errors in calculations and spelling mistakes in text responses using intelligent algorithms that award partial credit for valid reasoning whilst maintaining consistent scoring standards.
Marking Dashboard
View overall progress and completion rates with visual indicators showing status across multiple assessments and marking teams.
Individual Tracking
Monitor detailed workloads and timelines for specific markers with role-based access controls for coordinators and administrators.
Marker Allocation by Candidates or Items
Assign markers to specific candidates or question types with random or fixed allocation methods, balancing workloads whilst maintaining consistency and fairness.
Single and Dual Blind Marking
Configure anonymous marking workflows with identity masking options, supporting both single-marker efficiency and dual-marker reliability for high-stakes assessments.
Shared Annotations
Enable marker teams to view colleague comments and scoring rationales, facilitating collaborative quality assurance and professional development through peer review.
Advanced Online Marking Workflows
Manage complex human marking processes with one of the most powerful integrated online marking tools available, supporting detailed feedback, transparent moderation, flexible result delivery and comprehensive rescoring capabilities.
Direct Annotation
Add comments, highlights and corrections directly to candidate responses with rich text formatting for detailed feedback and evidence-based scoring decisions.
Criteria and Rubrics Scoring
Evaluate responses against predefined criteria with customisable rubric structures, enabling consistent marking standards across multiple assessors and sessions.
Multimedia Feedback
Provide written, file-based, audio or video feedback directly to candidates through the scoring panel, enabling personalised explanations and detailed guidance for improved learning outcomes.
Marking Scheme Comparison
Compare candidate responses directly with predefined marking schemes and model answers, enabling consistent evaluation and evidence-based scoring decisions across multiple markers.
Anonymous Marking
Protect candidate identity during assessment with masked submissions, preventing unconscious bias whilst maintaining comprehensive audit trails for governance and appeals.
Smart Moderation
Automatically flag submissions requiring review based on scoring differences between assessors, proximity to pass marks, specific score ranges or random sampling percentages for systematic quality assurance.
Random Quality Checks
Select random or targeted subsets of marked work for secondary review, providing statistical confidence in marking quality whilst managing moderation workload efficiently.
Review Sessions
Schedule controlled review periods allowing candidates to view marked responses and detailed feedback within defined timeframes for transparency and appeals management.
Selective Visibility
Control what information candidates see including scores, feedback, correct answers and marking annotations through configurable assessment options and dashboard settings.
Enhance Learning
Show feedback immediately after exam completion with references to study materials, enabling candidates to understand mistakes and reinforce learning whilst content remains fresh.
Preview Before Publishing
Calculate provisional score adjustments before applying changes, with real-time impact calculations showing effects on pass rates, average scores and grade distributions for informed decision-making.
Question Performance Analysis
Access comprehensive overviews of question performance with visual indicators and psychometric statistics including RIT, RIR, P and PC values to identify problematic items requiring rescoring.
Appeals Management
Flag candidate results for re-marking to handle appeals systematically, enabling coordinators to address scoring disputes and maintain assessment integrity through structured review processes.